For decades, Highway 101 has acted as more than just a multi-lane artery for Silicon Valley’s commute; it has been a psychological and social moat. In Palo Alto, if you lived west of the 101, you were "in the city." If you were east of it, you were likely in an office park, a marsh, or a different city entirely. Crossing that asphalt divide with a residential permit was, for a long time, considered a civic impossibility.
But the wall just cracked.
In a unanimous decision that caught many long-time observers by surprise, Palo Alto has officially approved its first-ever housing development on the east side of the highway (Palo Alto Online) [2]. The project at 2775 Embarcadero Way isn’t just about adding doors and windows to the inventory; it’s a symbolic white flag in the city’s long-standing war against density and a bold step toward a more integrated Silicon Valley.
Developed by Sares Regis, this 145-unit townhouse project represents a fundamental shift in how we view the "frontiers" of our own neighborhoods. At the McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment (MFFCE), we see this as more than a real estate win. It is a masterclass in challenging the "it’s never been done" mindset that often stifles community growth.
In this deep dive, we’re going to look at:
- How the "Builder’s Remedy" and state pressure finally forced a breakthrough in Palo Alto’s zoning.
- Why "Missing Middle" townhomes are the secret weapon for revitalizing Silicon Valley neighborhoods.
- The infrastructure hurdles: from bike bridges to floodplains: that come with building on the Baylands frontier.
The Great Divide: Why East of 101 Mattered
To understand why 145 townhomes are making headlines, you have to understand the geography of exclusion. Highway 101 has historically served as a hard border between Palo Alto’s residential heart and its industrial/natural edges. By keeping housing on one side, the city maintained a certain character but also exacerbated a housing shortage that has reached crisis proportions (California Legislative Analyst’s Office) [6].
Silicon Valley needs to stop treating its highways as hard borders and start seeing every parcel as an opportunity for community. This project at 2775 Embarcadero Way effectively annexes the office-park desert back into the residential fold. It’s an admission that the old ways of siloed zoning: work here, live there, drive between: are officially dead (SPUR) [8].
The Project Specs: More Than Just "Units"
The approval covers 145 townhomes, a significant addition for a city that has often struggled to meet even a fraction of its state-mandated housing goals (City of Palo Alto) [1]. What makes this project stand out is the commitment to the "missing middle." These aren't high-rise luxury towers, nor are they sprawling single-family mansions. They are dense, walkable townhomes that cater to families and professionals who are currently priced out of the traditional Palo Alto market (National Low Income Housing Coalition) [14].
Crucially, about 13% of these units: roughly 19 homes: are designated as affordable for lower-income buyers (Palo Alto Online) [2]. While 13% might sound modest to some, in the context of Palo Alto’s historic resistance to affordable developments, it’s a vital foot in the door for equity-building in one of the world's most expensive zip codes.
The Builder’s Remedy: The Ghost in the Room
You can’t talk about this approval without talking about the "Builder’s Remedy." For the uninitiated, this is a provision in California law that allows developers to bypass local zoning rules if a city fails to have a state-approved housing plan (Terner Center for Housing Innovation) [10].
While Palo Alto eventually got its housing element certified, the specter of the Builder’s Remedy changed the conversation. It shifted the power dynamic from "Will the city allow this?" to "How can we make this work so we don't lose all control?" (San Francisco YIMBY) [16]. This project is a direct result of that new legal reality. It shows that when the state provides the "stick," cities are much more likely to find the "carrot" of community enrichment.
Living with the Baylands: Environmental Harmony
Building east of the 101 means building near the Palo Alto Baylands. This brings up a host of "frontier" challenges, particularly regarding flood protection and sea-level rise. Critics often point to the environmental fragility of the area as a reason to block housing. However, the Sares Regis model suggests a shift toward blending residential life with the natural environment rather than hiding from it (Valley Water) [15].
The project involves raising the site's elevation and integrating modern drainage systems: technologies that allow us to live sustainably in sensitive areas (City of Palo Alto Planning Commission) [11]. It’s a visionary approach that says we don’t have to choose between housing people and protecting the planet; we can use smart design to do both.
The Infrastructure Gap: Bridges, Not Walls
Look, the biggest "but" in this whole story is infrastructure. If we’re going to put 145 families east of the highway, how do they get to the grocery store? How do kids get to school without risking their lives on a highway overpass?
The Palo Alto City Council voiced these exact concerns during the unanimous approval (Palo Alto Daily Post) [7]. Current bike and pedestrian bridges are sparse and often disconnected from where people actually live. For this "frontier" to succeed, Palo Alto needs to invest in "barrier-breaking" infrastructure. We need more pedestrian bridges and a faster shift toward making the Baylands accessible by something other than a Tesla.
Revitalizing the Office Park
The site at 2775 Embarcadero Way was previously dominated by office space: a relic of the pre-remote-work era. Across Silicon Valley, office vacancies are at historic highs while housing demand remains astronomical (Bay Area Council) [2026 Economic Outlook] [9].
Converting these underutilized "gray-fields" into vibrant neighborhoods is exactly the kind of revitalization MFFCE supports. It turns a static, 9-to-5 zone into a 24/7 community where people actually have a stake in the land. It’s an economic development play that strengthens the city’s tax base while solving its most pressing social issue (Silicon Valley Community Foundation) [5].
A Timeline of Palo Alto’s Housing Evolution
| Date | Milestone | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| 1950s | Construction of Highway 101 creates a physical divide in Palo Alto. | (Historical Archives) [17] |
| 2015 | Palo Alto faces increasing pressure from HCD over low housing production. | (HCD) [3] |
| Oct 2022 | California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) warns Palo Alto its housing element is non-compliant. | (HCD) [3] |
| Jan 2023 | The "Builder's Remedy" window opens for developers in non-compliant cities. | (Terner Center) [10] |
| May 2023 | Sares Regis submits preliminary plans for 2775 Embarcadero Way. | (City Staff Report) [11] |
| Sept 2025 | Palo Alto finally receives state certification for its 6th Cycle Housing Element. | (City of Palo Alto) [1] |
| Mar 2026 | City Council unanimously approves the 145-unit townhome project. | (Palo Alto Online) [2] |
| Late 2026 | Expected groundbreaking for the first housing development east of 101. | (Project Timeline) [4] |
Data: The RHNA Reality Check
Palo Alto is under massive pressure to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Here is how the numbers stack up for the current cycle:
| Income Level | Goal (6th Cycle) | Approved Projects (to date) | Percentage Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very Low Income | 1,556 | 210 | 13.5% |
| Low Income | 896 | 145 | 16.2% |
| Moderate Income | 1,013 | 88 | 8.7% |
| Above Moderate | 2,621 | 940 | 35.8% |
| TOTAL | 6,086 | 1,383 | 22.7% |
| (Source: Compiled from City of Palo Alto Housing Progress Reports 2026) [1, 13] |
Case Example: The 2775 Embarcadero Way Breakthrough
The Sares Regis project didn't just happen; it was a result of intense negotiation and a changing political tide. Initially, there were concerns that the site's proximity to the airport and the Baylands would make it uninhabitable. However, the developer used a "townhouse cluster" design that maximized shared green space while providing the privacy families crave.
The stakes were high: if this failed, it would have signaled that the "East of 101" barrier was permanent. Instead, the outcome was a unanimous "yes." It proved that when developers bring high-quality, "missing middle" designs to the table, even the most cautious councils can find their way to an approval (Palo Alto Daily Post) [7].
What Smart Critics Argue
No major development in Silicon Valley goes without pushback. Here’s what the critics are saying: and why they might be missing the bigger picture.
1. The "Island" Problem: Critics argue that residents will be isolated from the rest of the city, trapped between the highway and the bay.
- The Reality: While connectivity is a challenge, isolation is solved by more development, not less. Creating a residential cluster east of 101 provides the critical mass needed to justify new transit lines and pedestrian bridges.
2. Environmental Risk: Some worry about building on a floodplain.
- The Reality: Modern engineering, including the site elevation planned for this project, is designed specifically for these conditions. Furthermore, higher-density inland development is the best way to prevent urban sprawl into even more sensitive wildlands (Valley Water) [15].
3. School Capacity: The "how do they get to school" question is valid.
- The Reality: This is a call to action for the city, not a reason to deny housing. If we can build a 10-lane highway, we can build a safe bike path for kids.
Key Takeaways
- Barriers are breaking: This is the first residential project east of 101 in Palo Alto history.
- Density works: 145 townhomes provide "missing middle" housing that is desperately needed.
- Affordability matters: 13% of units are set aside for lower-income buyers.
- The "Stick" works: State laws like the Builder's Remedy have fundamentally changed the negotiation process.
- Environment and Housing can coexist: Smart design allows for safe living in the Baylands area.
- Infrastructure is the next frontier: The city must now follow through with pedestrian and bike connectivity.
- Economic shift: Moving from office-only zoning to mixed-use is the future of Silicon Valley.
Actions You Can Take
At Work:
Encourage your company to support "housing-near-work" initiatives. If you work in an office park, advocate for mixed-use rezoning that allows your colleagues to live closer to the office.
At Home:
Educate your neighbors on the "missing middle." Show them that townhomes and duplexes aren't "scary density": they are homes for the teachers, firefighters, and young professionals who keep our community running.
In the Community:
Support local nonprofits like the McFadden Finch Foundation that focus on neighborhood revitalization and affordable housing. Your voice in community meetings makes a difference.
In Civic Life:
Email the Palo Alto City Council (or your own local council) and tell them you support "barrier-breaking" projects. Demand that they prioritize the bike bridges and pedestrian paths that make these new neighborhoods viable.
The "Extra Step":
Join a local planning committee or a housing advocacy group like YIMBY Action. Moving the needle on 6,086 homes requires consistent, long-term civic engagement.
FAQ
Q: Why was this area off-limits for so long?
A: Primarily due to zoning that prioritized industrial and office use, combined with environmental concerns about the Baylands and a general "NIMBY" (Not In My Backyard) sentiment toward residential growth east of the highway.
Q: Is the housing actually "affordable"?
A: 19 of the 145 units are designated for lower-income buyers. While the rest are market-rate, increasing the total supply of townhomes helps alleviate the upward pressure on prices across the city (National Low Income Housing Coalition) [14].
Q: What about the noise from the 101?
A: Modern construction standards for townhomes in these zones include advanced soundproofing and triple-paned windows to ensure a quiet living environment.
Q: Will this cause more traffic?
A: While every new home adds some traffic, townhomes in walkable, bikeable areas: especially those near employment hubs: actually reduce the "super-commutes" that clog our highways the most.
Q: When can people move in?
A: Groundbreaking is expected in late 2026, with the first residents likely moving in by 2028, pending final permitting and construction timelines (Project Timeline) [4].
Invest in People. Strengthen Communities. Change Lives.
Your support helps expand opportunity, uplift families, and create lasting impact where it matters most. The McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to enriching lives, supporting families, and strengthening communities through purposeful giving and community-centered action. Every contribution helps create measurable, lasting change.
McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment
Lake Merritt Plaza
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1872-73
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 941-1421
www.mcfaddenfinchfoundation.org
info@mcfaddenfinchfoundation.org
Donate:
https://www.zeffy.com/en-US/donation-form/donate-to-change-lives-2137
EIN: 33-2590675
The McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Donations are tax-deductible to the fullest extent allowed by law.
Sources
[1] City of Palo Alto, “Housing Element 2023-2031,” City of Palo Alto, 2025, https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current-Planning/Housing-Element, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[2] Palo Alto Online, “City approves townhome project near the Palo Alto Baylands,” Palo Alto Online, March 17, 2026, https://www.paloaltoonline.com/housing/2026/03/17/city-approves-townhome-project-near-the-palo-alto-baylands/, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[3] California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), “RHNA 6th Cycle Progress Reports,” HCD, 2026, https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-open-data-tools/housing-element-implementation-and-compliance-tracker, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[4] Sares Regis Group of Northern California, “2775 Embarcadero Way Project Details,” Sares Regis, 2026, https://www.srgnc.com/projects, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[5] Silicon Valley Community Foundation, “Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization Report,” SVCF, 2025, https://www.siliconvalleycf.org/housing-report, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[6] California Legislative Analyst’s Office, “California’s High Housing Costs: Causes and Consequences,” LAO, March 2015, https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/finance/housing-costs/housing-costs.aspx, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[7] Palo Alto Daily Post, “Council approves housing east of 101,” Palo Alto Daily Post, March 16, 2026, https://padailypost.com/2026/03/16/council-approves-housing-east-of-101/, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[8] SPUR, “Housing the Region: A Strategy for the Bay Area,” SPUR, 2024, https://www.spur.org/publications/spur-report/2024-05-15/housing-region, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[9] Bay Area Council, “2026 Economic Outlook and Real Estate Trends,” Bay Area Council, 2026, https://www.bayareacouncil.org/economic-outlook-2026, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[10] Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, “The Builder’s Remedy: A New Tool for Housing,” Terner Center, 2023, https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/builders-remedy-explainer/, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[11] City of Palo Alto Planning Commission, “Staff Report: 2775 Embarcadero Way,” City of Palo Alto, 2025, https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/planning-and-transportation-commission/2025/ptc-staff-report-embarcadero.pdf, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[12] California State Senate, “SB 35 and Housing Streamlining Fact Sheet,” California Senate, 2023, https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/sb35, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[13] U.S. Census Bureau, “Palo Alto Demographic and Housing Trends 2020-2025,” Census Bureau, 2025, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/paloaltocitycalifornia, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[14] National Low Income Housing Coalition, “Out of Reach 2025: California,” NLIHC, 2025, https://nlihc.org/oor/state/ca, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[15] Valley Water, “Baylands Flood Protection Projects and Sea Level Rise,” Valley Water, 2025, https://www.valleywater.org/project-updates/baylands-flood-protection, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[16] San Francisco YIMBY, “New Housing Approvals Palo Alto: Breaking the 101 Barrier,” SF YIMBY, 2026, https://sfyimby.com/palo-alto-approvals, Accessed April 24, 2026.
[17] Palo Alto Historical Association, "The Development of the Bayshore Highway," PAHA, https://www.pahistory.org/highway-development, Accessed April 24, 2026.
Disclaimer: This content is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, tax, nonprofit, philanthropic, or other professional advice. Reading this content does not create an advisory, fiduciary, funding, or professional relationship with McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment. Because every organization, program, and community has different needs, you should consult qualified professionals regarding your specific circumstances. McFadden Finch Foundation for Community Enrichment makes no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and is not responsible for third-party content, links, products, services, or organizations referenced. Testimonials, examples, stories, and impact statements are illustrative only and do not guarantee similar results.